Myline: Tom Matthews I remember when...
Friday, February 17, 2012 at 11:25AM There were only two cities in England where people living with HIV could meet.
There was no statutory funding for HIV.
Peer support groups began springing up throughout the United Kingdom.
‘The concept of self-help is as valid today as it was at the start.’
Then came statutory funding and at last some of those voluntary sector HIV services had parity with the services that were being established within the NHS and local government.
Then came the withdrawal of the ring fenced HIV Health Funds and the same thing happened to the local government’s AIDS Support Grant. I always wondered why as the payers of both national taxes and local community charges, it was only possible to meet our needs through the provision of “special funds” ?
With the infamous “credit crunch” everyone suddenly started to face some of those realities that we had grown used to living with.
I have, and will always continue to argue, that people living with HIV should receive the same quality of services as every other citizen and I think we need to return to the “old” days when our commitment and enthusiasm was continually under pressure. Those days when we literally had to fight for everything we received.
I also believe we should once again remember why we so veraciously refused to be labelled victims; the concept of self-help is as valid today as it was at the start.
This should remind us that there are certain things that we can provide for ourselves, in a much more effective way than any paid worker – support, understanding and the ability to empower each other.
Let’s remember where we started and learn from our experience. We have a history, of which we should be proud.
Maybe the future need not be as bleak as some would have us believe?
Reader Comments (12)
Why did so little money go to people living with HIV/AIDS ? raised by Crusaid ?
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2010/06/14/jobs-may-be-lost-as-crusaid-and-tht-merge/
As of last March, Crusaid was £22,000 in debt and chief executive Jordan Hay said the recession had caused a “decrease” in income.
Crusaid offers funding to people living with HIV and suffering financial hardship. In 2008/9, it distributed £374,774 to 2,106 individuals. This was out of a total income of £1.6 million.
The charity spends just 39.9 per cent of its total spending on charitable activities,
How was the London HIV/AIDS Charity Sector able to Cover up its e-mail to a HIV Police Panel Member "pain and suffering to alot of people...if Crusaid is so bad get another job with a better employer" and use Charity Money to pay them off to keep quiet ????? as revealed on Pink News Website in the comments section on "Jobs may be lost as Crusaid and THT Merge...
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/?comments_popup=17668
Conntract of employment with correct start month & removal of someone else’s AIDS Diagnosis from Staff Appraisal….
From: irenwick@liberty.co.uk
To: XXXXXXXXXXhotmail.com
Subject: Crusaid discussions
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:20:47 +0000
Dear XXXXXXXX,
Thank you for the email that Robin has forwarded to me as you have requested. I am fully aware of the issues you have raised and hope that your meeting with Robin in January will resolve these for you.
I understand that there is an issue with the given start date on your contract of employment. I also know that you have pointed this out to Robin and that he has offered to look at and amend this for you. However you have included this in your formal complaint and under the procedures that we have in place, this must be handled in the meeting. No-one has at any point inferred or indicated as your email suggests that your job is being terminated.
We are aware of the importance of stress in the management of the HIV virus. However when a formal complaint is lodged, we do have to follow the procedures we have in place. It is the trustees’ view that a speedy meeting according to our procedures that can resolve your concerns is the best way to deal with the current situation. I understand that Robin has made himself available to meet with you at the earliest convenient time.
Crusaid Head of Dept Charity e-mail to HIV Police Panel Member…..
“pendantic,uncooperative and causing stress hassle and pain to alot of people” …..If Crusaid is so bad get another Job with a better employer”
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 15:12:56 +0000
From: RobinB@crusaid.org.uk
To: xxxxxxxxxxcrusaid.org.uk; xxxxxxcrusaid.org.uk; hotmail.com
I want to see the two of you in the meeting room tomorrow at 10 am. No excuses. I sincerely hope that this email conversation has not been widely distributed.
Robin Brady
Chief Executive
From: LGILMORE@hamlins.co.uk
To: XXXXXXXaol.com
Subject: RE: Thank You Invitation to Crusaid Events
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:31:55 +0000
Dear
XXXXXXX
Thank you for the email As you know I am co-chair of Crusaid as
well as their legal adviser .I am writing this to you in the latter capacity as
Crusaid’s solicitor . THAT WAS THE END
Crusaid THEN Sends Letter requesting feedback AND DONATION to HIV Police Panel Member after advising them to “GET ANOTHER JOB WITH A BETTER EMPLOYER !!!!
To: Crusaid Trustees
After your high court injunction e-mail which as you can imagine was very distressing,followed by a letter from a Head of Department a few weels later at Crusaid about being “the lifeblood of all we do, we could not go on without you” which is very kind of you all at Crusaid I received a few weeks later a letter from the CEO of Crusaid requesting a small donation and feedback on the running of the Charity with a pre-paid envelope and the CEO in their letter to me advising me in writing that Crusaid values feedback and to use the new e-mail address feedback@crusaid.org.uk could I therefore respectfully request you and the Board of Trustees’ clarify to me what sort of feedback on the running of Crusaid you and the CEO would like me to provide you with and I will then give your written request for feedback on the running of Crusaid the attention it deserves.
From: Laurence Gilmore (LGILMORE@hamlins.co.uk)
Sent: 20 November 2006 18:26:10
To: xxxxxxxxxxxxhotmail.com)
Robin
What is this about and why is he on circulation lists!!!
Best as ever,
Laurence
Tel: 020 7355 6102
Fax: 020 7518 9102
From: LGILMORE@hamlins.co.uk
To: xxxxxxxxhotmail.com; Angus.Hamilton@btinternet.com
CC: AElliot@ukcoalition.org; guscairns@blueyonder.co.uk; bforbes@ukcoalition.org; AKeightley@ukcoalition.org
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:52:53 +0100
Dear XXXXXXX
I have written to you today. We discussed this matter…. An error occurred. I dealt with it swiftly. … you are going on the walk….which is MARVELLOUS!
Post a reply →
Why did the London AIDS Charity UKC coverup Crusaids HIV Redundant Staff and not allow them a voice ? ? ? while obtaining funding and money to "ensure the diverse voices of people living with HIV/AIDS were heard" ? ? ?
Bernard Forbes [mailto:bforbes@ukcoalition.org]
>Sent: Tue 2005/03/29 03:48 PM
>To: Robin Brady
>Subject: FW: Further favour>
>Robin
>
>Further to below, I am told a letter regarding Walk for Life was received by
>xxxxxxxon 23 March.
>
>Mailshots to xxxx are a waste of Crusaid's time and money, all they do is
>wind him up and he then gets on to me.
>
>His walker ID is 19882, if that helps to get him off your lists altogether,
>while we try to help him get his life back together and move on.
>
>Best wishes
>
>Bernard>
Why was it covered-up a Police Panel Member was e-mailed a London AIDS Charitys Client Data Base including firstnames,surnames, and e-mail addresses of people living with HIV/AIDS in London ???? and also sent The Multiple Medical Data of a LGBT Police Panel Member ???????
From: xxxxxxxxx@met.police.uk
To: XXXXXXXXXhotmail.com
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@met.police.uk
Dear XXXXX
You write in your e-mail asking
if any Panel Members have any concerns if my colleagues were to write to the Evening Standard thanking the Panel for their support and the MET for exercising their discretion twice in not arresting a disabled resident, once for four months after I offered my resignation after a Aids Charity sent me medical data belonging to another Panel Member and again when a Aids Charity e-mailed me their client data base.
There are two issues regarding this statement. Firstly the fact that you had a database on your hard drive was not brought to the attention of the Group, although some of the individual members may have been aware of this fact.
. As you appreciate this was outside the remit of the group, and the decision as to your arrest was one that was reached internally within the Police and one that the xxxx LGBT Advisory group had no impact on.
Also in your e-mail you state
It should be noted I did e-mail the Panel asking if a Aids Charity began Injuctive Proceedings at the HIGH COURT without hesitation if it would affect my sitting on the Panel and I was e-mailed back that it would not. It should be further noted approx 4 weeks later I received a letter claiming I was "the lifeblood of all we do.We could not go on without you" which left me bewildered and distressed.
If you had of had injunctive proceedings taken against you this again would not have been a matter for the group as it would have been a private matter between you and the other party involved. This would not have affected your membership of the group.
I trust that this meets with your approval and any outstanding issues can now be resolved.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************************************************
It is the policy of the MPS that:
MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the MPS) must not use
MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or attachments:
* containing racist, homophobic,sexist, defamatory, offensive, illegal or
otherwise inappropriate material;
* for other than official or semi-official MPS purposes;
* containing material requiring a protective marking higher than
RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED across
the internet) without the use of approved encryption;
* containing personal data for use other than in accordance with
the notification(s) under the Data Protection Act, 1998 of the
system(s) from which the data originates.
* This Email message has been scanned for viruses and contents.
**********************************************************************
Now that The Terrence Higgins Trust has "destroyed" Crusaids Compromise Agreement (Gagging Order) inherited in the merger with Crusaid as per their e-mall below how was Charity money used to pay off Crusaids Staff ? ? ? and how much ? ? ?
From: Amanda.Bearman@tht.org.uk
To: hotmail.co.uk
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:23:37 +0000
Subject: RE: Fao Amanda Bearman THT Legal Advisor - Data Request for Data Being Destroyed by THT
Dear Mr xxxxxx,
I'm afraid I am unable to assist with your request as I did not consider the documents, did not keep a list and they are all now destroyed.
Kind regards
Amanda Bearman
The Trustees' of London AIDS Charity UKC e-mail Crusaids HIV Redundant Staff...with "damaged bits"
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:19:18 +0000
From: xxxxxxxxukcoalition.org
To: XXXXXXXX@ hotmail.com XXXXXXXX
I was going to email you anyway - I should feel proud that someone like you appreciates us doing the right thing so much that you are prepared to help us do it - you should be proud too, you should have a warm feeling inside that you are doing something to help other people in a mess. So who helps you ? It's hard I know, but some things need lines drawing under them on the basis that shit happens. Loads of shit happens, you've probably had more than most and it does a lot of damage. But you've got a lot to offer as well, if I had a magic wand I would cut out the damaged bits and set you free, but I don't and I can't
The Metropolitan Police confirm Data Protection Breaches to The Information Commissioner - all the ones The London AIDS Charity Sector has been trying to COVER_UP>>>>>
A POLICE PANEL MEMBER COMPLAINED TO THE METROPOLITAN POLICE AND OFFERED THEIR RESIGNATION TO THE CHIEF INSPECTOR AFTER BEING SENT THE MULTIPLE MEDICAL DATA BELONGING TO ANOTHER POLICE PANEL MEMBER OF THE GROUP BY LONDON AIDS CHARITY CRUSAID – THE POLICE DIDNT ACCEPT THEIR RESIGNATION.THEY FURTHER COMPLAINED THEY HAD BEEN E-MAILED BANKRUPT LONDON AIDS CHARITY UK COALITION OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS MIDWEEK SUPPORT GROUP CLIENT DATA BASE INC: FIRST NAMES,SURNAMES,POSTCODES,E-MAIL ADDRESSES OF PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV AIDS IN LONDON THE POLICE INSTRUCTED THEM TO CONTACT THE INFORMATION COMMISSIONER AND THE CHARITY COMMISSION.
ALL HUSHED UP FROM PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS IN LONDON
METROPOLITAN POLICE CONFIRM TO INFORMATION COMMISSIONER CRUSAIDS HIV RETURN TO WORK STAFF SENT LGBT POLICE PANEL MEMBERS MULTIPLE MEDICAL DATA…..
Sent: 18 January 2008 16:13:33
To: -----hotmail.co.uk
Cc: XXXXXXXXXXXXXmet.police.uk
XXXX
The phonecall with the person from the ICO was relatively short. I would point out that I have only told them what I know to be true or what you have communicated to me in relation directly to the data protection issue..
I explained that you had told me the following and I had provided advice where necessary
1. You had been passed medical data of a member of the LGBT advisory group…..
2. I explained that you had recieved data from a charity that you had previously done voluntary work with and who had also employed you. I had not seen the content. As soon as I became aware of your possision of it, I explained to you that possession of the data was illegal and data should not be retained unnecessarily. This was in breach of the Data Protection Act. I suggested that as you had come into “innocent possession” of it, that you would not be arrested and I had advised you to contact the charity and have the data removed. You later informaed me the hard drive had been cleaned but you were concerned the data may still remain. I advised you to contact the ICO as I felt that matter was not a Police matter.
I cannot speculate further than this and so accordingly I have just try to keep to the facts of what I know. I.E what you have told me and what I have told you.
I trust this assists
**********************************************************************
It is the policy of the MPS that:
MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the MPS) must not use
MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or attachments:
* containing racist, homophobic,sexist, defamatory, offensive, illegal or
otherwise inappropriate material;
* for other than official or semi-official MPS purposes;
* containing material requiring a protective marking higher than
RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED across
the internet) without the use of approved encryption;
* containing personal data for use other than in accordance with
the notification(s) under the Data Protection Act, 1998 of the
system(s) from which the data originates.
* This Email message has been scanned for viruses and contents
CHARITY COMMISSION ACTS AFTER COMPLAINT ABOUT DATA PROTECTION BREACHES BY LONDON HIV AIDS CHARITY SECTOR FROM POLICE PANEL MEMBER -ALL HUSHED UP.....
Subject: Information Commission Email
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:12:10 +0000
From: michael.o'donovan@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
To: xxxxhotmail.co.uk
Dear Mr ------
Thank you for forwarding this email from the Information Commissioner's Office and the subsequent correspondence between yourselves and The Metropolitan Police.
It appears from this email that the ICO is not directly requesting any information from the Charity Commission. I am, however, willing to clarify our involvement.
For the Information Commissioner's Office
We received a complaint from Mr -----in February 2007 about two registered charities. The main focus of the complaint was that confidential data had been sent to him and his name had been published in an online article. As these were disputes between an individual and a third-party and not covered by Charity Law, the Charity Commission did not have the remit to investigate these complaints. In the first instance we advised that these complaints be taken up with the trustees directly but failing this suggested he may wish to contact the Information Commissioner.
In May 2007, Mr -----came back to us with concerns about how a registered charity was dealing with sensitive information, including publishing his name on mailing lists and persons obtaining his contact details. We agreed to write to the trustees to remind them of their obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998 and referred Mr ------- to the Information Commissioner.
I hope this helps. Additionally, I have confirmed with ICO that they will contact us directly if they require any further information from the Charity Commission.
Yours sincerely
Michael O'Donovan
Charity Commission
ACT UP LONDON STOP THE LONDON AIDS CHARITY SECTOR COVER-UPS AND SCANDALS
DEMAND A TRANSPARENT UPFRONT AND HONEST AIDS CHARITY SECTOR - NO MORE COVER-UPS
CRUSAID PAYS HIV POLICE PANEL MEMBER AND STAFF
COMPENSATION FOR LOSS OF EMPLOYMENT
After Registered Charity Crusaid declaring on the Registered Charity UK Coalition of People Living with HIV/Aids Charity funded website Positive Nation’s Positive Voices “we’ve been upfront and honest” a few months after signing a Compromise Agreement which prevents to Charity from being upfront and honestDated 23rd July 2004 signed by Robin Brady CEO of Crusaid
“The Charity on its own behalf and on behalf of all Associaciated Companies shall without any admission or liability whatsoever, as compensation for loss of employment,pay to the Employee the sum of £_________ inclusive of his statutory redundancy payment…”
4. Settlement and Waiver
The Employee believes he may have statutory claims and therefore could bring proceedings, against the Charity or any Associated Company,or its or their Trustees,employees or officerrs or former trustees employees or officers for:-
Unfair Dismisall (Constructive)
Disability Discrimination
Detriments under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Unauthorised Deductions of Wages/Breach of Contract
Less favourable treatmet due to Part-Time status
The Employee agrees to accept the terms of this Agreement in Full and Final Settlement of his prospective entitlement to bring the proceedings referred to in the above.
8 The Employee’s Ongoing Obligations
“not to make, or cause to be made,(directly or indirectly) any derogatory or critical comments or statement (whether orally or in writing) about the Charity, their respective trustees, officers or employees”
Its noted PinkNews has the statement the Trustees “are a bunch of clowns”
“not to disclose (directly or indirectly) to any person or organisation the contents of this Agreement
“not to make, or cause to be made (directly or indirectly) any statement or comment to the Press or other Media concerning his employment with the Charity .
8.4 The Employee will resign from the Charitys Theatrecares Committee, and the Charity will accept this Compromise Agreement as such formal resignation.
9. The Charity’s Ongoing Obigations
9.1 …….
9.2
9.3 The Charity will remove reference to the Employee from its headed notepaper and the forthcoming Annual Review
Post a reply →
the poverty sisters 11 months ago Report
0
Crusaids Returns to The Charity Commission March 2009
Trustees [as at 31 March 2009]
Rob Kemp Chair
William Hotopf [Treasurer]
David Collins – Resigned 26 may 2009
Deborah Fitzgerald – Resigned 25 November 2008
Ian Reeves – Resigned 23 October 2008
Nigel Abba – Resigned 13 January 2009
Laurence Issacson – Resigned 4th June 2008
Lars Goldhamlner – Resigned 9th June 2009
Richard French
Simon Watney
Julia Washington – Resigned 3 December 2009
Francesca Boardman – Resigned 6 October 2009
Dr Tom Brett – appointed 30 September 2008
Hope its nothing I e-mailed
1. The Wig Party raised £40,000-00 (No employee earned over £60,000-00) The Wig Party did not raise enough to Pay the CEO
2. The Year also saw a one-off Production of a Celebratory Musical event at The London Palladium starring Angela Lansbury…the financial performance was dissapointing returning a break even result – Didnt raise a Penny but the Charity workers all GOT PAID at Crusaid as they did when the Liza Minelli UKC Hero Awards didnt raise a Penny
Outside the Walk for Life, the trading …returned less income to the Charity this year – But the Charity Workes all GOT PAID
Reserves Policy
As at 31 March 2009 Crusaids unrestricted fund Balance was £22,631 in deficit – but the Charity Workers all GOT PAID
4. Financial Position
The Consolodated cash at bank Position as at 31 March 2009 is £28,553 OVERDRAWN – but the Charity Workes all GOT PAID
5. Returns for 2009
Turnover £612,045 Cost of Sales £526,624 !
Support Costs
Staff Costs Staffcosts £445,110.00
Overhead Costs £323,010
TOTAL = £768,120.00
6. Crusaids Returns to Charity Commission for March 2008
To become Financially stable and sustainable
7. An emergency Grant was made to the UKC as part of a rescue package…
We asked what happend to the much publicised Rescue Package from Crusaid of £25,000-00 Emergency Grant –
UKC declared Bankruptcy after the cheque had cleared and the money was used to Pay The Insolvency Practioner as UKC ISP Report dictates “Poor Record and Bookeeping No trusts set up
Crusaid Impact Report 2006
Together we shall continue to make
a massive impact in the next 20 years.
Robin Brady, Chief Executive
lain Renwick, co-Chairman
Laurence Gilmore, co-Chairman
UKC Rescue Package lost people living with HIV/Aids another £50,000-00
Congratulations to The Trustees of Crusaid for theatening a Police Panel Member with a HIGH COURT INJUNCTION and then apologising for writing to them for Money ALL HUSHED UP
Subject: RE: Crusaid - Letter from Crusaid March 2007 sent to me in error
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 13:56:34 +0100
From: LGILMORE@hamlins.co.uk
To: xxxxhotmail.com
Dear
I have contacted Crusaid. They do not know why your name is still on the circulation list for Walk for Life.It should have been removed . I have requested the same forthwith. I would imagine the list is separate to the main contact list. Apologies this was not done before. However as you know this is a circular - altho' you should not receive it.
I note you will be walking which is marvellous. It shows that the email re the walk this year cannot have caused the offence etc as you say. No money is wasted on an email mail out. I may see you on the walk as I intend to continue to raise money for those poverty stricken by this dreadful illness. My passion in that regard has not changed .
I will not be responding any further. Your continued reference to the injunction is with respect irrelevant and relates to totally separate matters long closed.
I wish you well. Kind regards.
Laurence
for Hamlins LLP
Tel: 020 7355 6102
Fax: 020 7518 9102
Subject: Information Commission Email
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:12:10 +0000
From: michael.o'donovan@charitycommission.gsi.gov.uk
Toxxxxxhotmail.co.uk
Dear Mr xxxxxxxxx
Thank you for forwarding this email from the Information Commissioner's Office and the subsequent correspondence between yourselves and the Metropolitan Police.
It appears from this email that the ICO is not directly requesting any information from the Charity Commission. I am, however, willing to clarify our involvement. For the Information Commissioner's Office We received a complaint from Mrxxxxx in February 2007 about two registered charities. The main focus of the complaint was that confidential data had been sent to him and his name had been published in an online article. As these were disputes between an individual and a third-party and not covered by Charity Law, the Charity Commission did not have the remit to investigate these complaints. In the first instance we advised that these complaints be taken up with the trustees directly but failing this suggested he may wish to contact the Information Commissioner.
In May 2007, Mr xxxxx came back to us with concerns about how a registered charity was dealing with sensitive information, including publishing his name on mailing lists and persons obtaining his contact details. We agreed to write to the trustees to remind them of their obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998 and referred Mr xxxxxto the Information Commissioner. The trustees confirmed to us by letter that they had removed Mr xxxx from their mailing list and had no record of contacting him recently. As we had no further regulatory role to play we closed our case.
I hope this helps. Additionally, I have confirmed with ICO that they will contact us directly if they require any further information from the Charity Commission.
Yours sincerely
Michael O'Donovan
Charity Commission
The Metropolitan Police confirm Police Panel Member and Crusaid Staff offered resignation to The Chief Inspector of The MPS after being left "seriously distressed" at Data Protection breaches by London AIDS Charity Sector - All Covered Up from People living with HIV/AIDS in UK
From: xxxxxxxxx@met.police.uk
To: XXXXXXXXXhotmail.com
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@met.police.uk
Dear XXXXX
You write in your e-mail asking
if any Panel Members have any concerns if my colleagues were to write to the Evening Standard thanking the Panel for their support and the MET for exercising their discretion twice in not arresting a disabled resident, once for four months after I offered my resignation after a Aids Charity sent me medical data belonging to another Panel Member and again when a Aids Charity e-mailed me their client data base.
There are two issues regarding this statement. Firstly the fact that you had a database on your hard drive was not brought to the attention of the Group, although some of the individual members may have been aware of this fact.
. As you appreciate this was outside the remit of the group, and the decision as to your arrest was one that was reached internally within the Police and one that the xxxx LGBT Advisory group had no impact on. Also in your e-mail you state It should be noted I did e-mail the Panel asking if a Aids Charity began Injuctive Proceedings at the HIGH COURT without hesitation if it would affect my sitting on the Panel and I was e-mailed back that it would not. It should be further noted approx 4 weeks later I received a letter claiming I was "the lifeblood of all we do.We could not go on without you" which left me bewildered and distressed.
If you had of had injunctive proceedings taken against you this again would not have been a matter for the group as it would have been a private matter between you and the other party involved. This would not have affected your membership of the group.
I trust that this meets with your approval and any outstanding issues can now be resolved.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**********************************************************************
It is the policy of the MPS that:
MPS personnel (or agents working on behalf of the MPS) must not use
MPS systems to author, transmit or store documents such as electronic mail (e-mail) messages or attachments:
* containing racist, homophobic,sexist, defamatory, offensive, illegal or
otherwise inappropriate material;
* for other than official or semi-official MPS purposes;
* containing material requiring a protective marking higher than
RESTRICTED, (and not higher than NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED across
the internet) without the use of approved encryption;
* containing personal data for use other than in accordance with
the notification(s) under the Data Protection Act, 1998 of the
system(s) from which the data originates.
* This Email message has been scanned for viruses and contents.
**********************************************************************
Crusaid instruct HIV Return to work staff to "MOVE ON" after e-mail Pain and suffering to alot of People if Crusaid is so bad get anoher job with a better employer"
From: "Laurence Gilmore" <LGILMORE@hamlins.co.uk>
To: "hotmail.com>, <Angus.Hamilton@btinternet.com>
CC: <AElliot@ukcoalition.org>, <guscairns@blueyonder.co.uk>, , <AKeightley@ukcoalition.org>
Subject: RE: FAO L GILMORE - INVITATION - Crusaids E-mail
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:52:53 +0100
Dear
I have written to you today. We discussed this matter and you confirmed on the telephone and in writing that this has not caused any stress. An error occurred. I dealt with it swiftly. We agreed that was the end of it.
I respectfully suggest it is time to move on.The circular letter is not offensive and indeed you are going on the walk....which is MARVELLOUS!
I decline your invitation.